It’s been a busy week, so I just wanted to quickly revisit something form my “to read” list – A research summary about the benefits of racial and socio-economic integration that came out last March from the National Coalition on School Diversity.
If you’re looking for a good, short (10 pgs) summary of the research or if you want to create a reading list for yourself, this is a solid place to begin. (I’ve also tried to include links to as many of the original studies as I could find.) As we’ve known for a long time, there are many benefits to school integration. This report summarizes those more familiar findings, while highlighting two important/overlooked findings:
- Racial and economic integration are beneficial for ALL students
- Racial and economic integration are NOT interchangeable – they each have benefits, some of which overlap and some of which are unique.
Here’s the summary of racial integration benefits:
- Improved academic achievement:
- Racial integration has strongly positive achievement gains for students of color, including a lower dropout rate. (See also here, here, and here.) The benefits are stronger the earlier a student starts in an integrated school. And, white students also benefit academically from school integration or, in some cases, integration has had “no detrimental impact on student achievement.” That is: white students have been fine. There isn’t a research basis for arguing that they won’t be okay.
- Stronger “intergroup relations”:
- One study re-analyzed data from over 500 earlier studies and found that contact among people(including K-12 students) of different races has “positive impacts on all groups by reducing prejudice, negative attitudes, and stereotypes while at the same time increasing friendships.” Again, benefits for all students here. Other studies have linked school integration to greater comfort with those from different backgrounds and “improvements in critical thinking, communication and problem solving.”
- Positive outcomes beyond K-12 education:
- A famous study by Rucker C. Johnson focused on adults born between 1945-1968 and followed them until 2013 (!), which is just incredible from a research perspective. So, at the end of the study, people were between 45-68 years old. It found that, for black adults, integrated schools were associated with increased educational and career attainment beyond high school, higher lifetime earnings, a decreased risk of incarceration, and even better health. Other studies have found that increased comfort with people from different backgrounds also extends beyond high school, including feeling “prepared to participate in democratic processes with diverse groups of people.” Dr. Johnson talks about his work and related studies in a great short video that summarizes the benefits of racially integrated schools for all students.
Some of the positive outcomes above were also found in schools that are economically integrated, especially the academic outcomes. Because race and SES are closely related, studies have had a hard time separating these out. That said, you can’t get the full benefit of positive intergroup relationships without contact with people of different races.
Recent studies have used more sophisticated statistical methods to separate the effects of socio-economic and racial integration. These have found that racial integration, specifically, is linked to: improved language acquisition in PreK and higher scores on the National Assessment of Educational Progress.
So, is that it? We’re done? Let’s just spread the word about this and then everyone will be on board? As a researcher, I want to think that the research is that important/compelling, and, in some ways, it is. For one thing, all these studies look at real schools with real people in them, whose lives have measurably benefited from school integration. So, for them it matters. I think/hope it would matter for people who don’t follow this issue closely, but are nonetheless capable of approaching it with an open mind.
It should also matter for court rulings about school integration. Since the late 70’s, the supreme court has limited the extent to which race can be considered in school integration plans. Research shows this to be misguided, offering a strong justification for considering race directly/explicitly, given that racial integration carries its own unique benefits (which has been recognized in Parents Involved, though this is not part of the common understanding of this case).
But, in what is supposedly the age of data, the data on school integration is almost completely overlooked. We have solid evidence of its benefits, and we have over a century of evidence that “separate but equal” is harmful. In everything from the policies that are made to the everyday conversations about school integration, this doesn’t seem to matter. Decisions to segregate are made in the gut or maybe (sadly) in the heart, but not in the head. It touches core beliefs and unexamined social assumptions that are wrapped up in fears of being labeled a bad person or a bad parent.
So, where does this leave us? I’m hoping/planning to devote my career to research on school (de)segregation, so I obviously think it’s important, and I think it can be powerful. But, how? Where does it fit into the larger public conversation about school/social segregation? What are the best venues for this? What types of questions should researchers be asking? Sometimes I feel as stumped by these questions as I am motivated to answer them.
Update: In response to the Harris/Biden exchange about school integration, Matt Barnum at Chalkbeat published this very helpful and thorough review of the literature on the benefits of school integration.
19 thoughts on “Research Review: The overwhelming yet overlooked benefits of racial integration”
Peter! This is so inspirational. Thrilled to have found your blog and excited to be continuously inspired!
Pingback: About that Malcolm Gladwell podcast | School Desegregation Notebook
Pingback: SD Notebook is now a part of NCSD! | School Desegregation Notebook
Pingback: Intro to School Integration: Top-12 Resources, Part 2 | School Diversity Notebook
Pingback: SD News Roundup, part 2: Research & op-eds about white parents | School Diversity Notebook
Pingback: SD News Roundup: Kamala Harris, Joe Biden & “busing” | School Diversity Notebook
Pingback: SD News Roundup: Kamala Harris, Joe Biden & “busing” Part 2 | School Diversity Notebook
Pingback: Segregation, protest & a window for change: Model legislation from NCSD | School Diversity Notebook
Pingback: School Choice is a Harmful Fraud | tultican
Pingback: New Research: Literacy outcomes in segregated schools | School Diversity Notebook
Pingback: New Research: Benefits for white students in integrated schools | School Diversity Notebook
Pingback: New Research: Strategies for integration in dual-language programs | School Diversity Notebook
Pingback: #KnowBetterDoBetter: A conversation among White parents, advocates & educators about school integration | School Diversity Notebook
Pingback: How Teachers & Leaders Facilitate Integration in a Two-Way Dual Language Immersion Program | School Diversity Notebook
Pingback: Parents’ Conceptions of School Enrollment as Property | School Diversity Notebook
Pingback: When White parents believe in diversity and deficit | School Diversity Notebook
Pingback: Accountability Systems & the Persistence of School Segregation | School Diversity Notebook
Pingback: Betrayal of Brown: A recap of NCSD’s #RodriguezAt50 Twitter chat | School Diversity Notebook
Pingback: Competing schools or competing families? The segregative effects of neighborhood racial change and a school lottery in Washington DC | School Diversity Notebook